
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
How Much Should Weight Loss Drugs Cost?
A new study found that fair prices for medications like Wegovy and Zepbound would be hundreds less per month than they are now.

Itโs easy to make a medical case for blockbuster weight loss drugs like Wegovy and Zepbound, which have been shown to prevent heart attacks and strokes and save lives.
But for the employers and government programs being asked to pay for the medications, the financial case for them is less clear. Are the drugsโ benefits worth their enormous cost?
The answer right now is no, according to a new study published on Friday in the journal JAMA Health Forum, by researchers at the University of Chicago.
To be considered cost effective by a common measure used by health economists, the price of Novo Nordiskโs Wegovy would need to be cut by over 80 percent, to $127 per month, the researchers concluded. And Eli Lillyโs Zepbound would be cost effective only if its price fell by nearly a third, to $361 per month. (Zepbound warranted a higher price, the researchers said, because it produced greater benefits in clinical trials.)
โThereโs no doubt that the drugs are demonstrating tremendous health benefits,โ said David Kim, a health economist at the University of Chicago and the senior author of the study, which was funded by government grants. โThe problem is the price is too high.โ
Thereโs widespread hope that the drugs will effectively pay for themselves in the long run, by making patients healthier and preventing expensive medical bills. Itโs not clear yet whether that will turn out to be true.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit andย log intoย your Times account, orย subscribeย for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber?ย Log in.
Want all of The Times?ย Subscribe.
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Source: https://www.nytimes.com